LiveJournal for Shataina.

View:User Info.
View:Friends.
View:Calendar.
View:Website (Shataina's Story).
View:Memories.
You're looking at the latest 20 entries. Missed some entries? Then simply jump back 20 entries.

Thursday, May 8th, 2008

Subject:I bet you want a ridiculous project to accomplish over the next few days
Time:9:07 pm.
ScavHunt has commenced! I'm not doing too much this year -- more than last year, less than the previous year -- but of course I read the list over and I've put in some hours at my team's HQ. This year I defected from the FIST (which I still love regardless) to the Grad Student/Alumni team (at least partly because I find it so hilarious that I was invited to join notwithstanding the fact that I am neither a grad student nor an alumna).

Some dedicated people on my team managed to rent one of the unused storefronts on 55th Street for our HQ. Location, location, location! We're right near the dollar store, some Thai restaurants, and the hookah lounge.

If you should happen to review the list and be interested in helping us out, I'd love to hook you up to our awesome site and encourage you to go crazy ....

Some of my favourite items this year (I highly encourage that you Google references you don't recognize):

14. Dammit if Scav Hunt doesn't have the hardest time getting up those impossible hills in Hyde Park. If only we had a funicular to ease our ascent ....

21. Remember when you were in elementary school and you had to make a model of a volcano out of papier-mache and baking soda? Well, do that again. Only really big. There is a limit on the number of points you can win, but there's no limit on how big your volcano can be.

33. Have a potato break the sound barrier.

40. A bust of Abraham Lincoln made out of pennies.

46. I just love puppet shows. Make ready your miniature temple and chinampas because we're reliving Tenochtitlan's former glory as well as its precarious downfall. Of course the show would not be complete without puppet Cortez, puppet Montezuma, and ritual human -- err, puppet -- sacrifice. Catch is, the city has to float.

56. A zeusaphone.

71. Fix the CTA! Duct tape together two different stations of the El.

76. Spend a night at a major Chicago museum, a la From The Mixed-Up Files of Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler.

79. The prank call of Cthulhu.

89. Greetings, Aperture Science Test Subject #3252613. You need a friend, one that cannot speak, and thus will never threaten to stab you. Please construct a fully-functional weighted companion cube. For the best one, there will be cake.

110. A recreation of Michelangelo's "Birth of Man" or Picasso's "Guernica". In tooth marks. On your back.

124. A computer virus that does little to my computer's ability to function but scares the living hell out of me. [Windows 9.5 points]

135. A robot programmed to love. [3 points per tear that your robot's cuteness draws from my eye. -300 points if 'love' involves a vibrator]

136. The Blues Brothers set future Chicagoans up for a major disappointment: since moving here, I have never once seen enormous groups of strangers moved, as if part of a flash mob, to spontaneously burst in elaborately choreographed song-and-dance numbers in iconic locations. Fix that.

157. Exit, pursued by a bear.

176. Present an appropriate mom with a bumper sticker that says, "My Child is a Nobel Laureate." I think you know what font it needs to be in.

179. A genuine copy of The Pleasure Prison of the B'thuvian Demon Whore. Bring evidence that you have survived it and displayed a level of sophistication that is beyond the ken of the mere hobbyist gamer. [1d20 points] (Yeah, I'm on this one. I may dress up like Krunk, the barbarian from the frozen wastes.)

181. Egon Spengler, painted in the style of Egon Schiele.

184. Wearing a black and white striped shirt, a black toque, and a burlap sack full of money with a big dollar sign on the front, go into that bank. And buy a savings bond. [15 to Life points]

194. Pocket rockets. Pockets made of rockets. Pockets® made of rockets. Rockets made of Pockets®. Rockets made of rockets. Pockets made of Pockets®. Pockets® made of Pockets®.

205. You gotta taste this! This is... oh, it's got a kind of... mmm, it's burny, it's melty... it's not really a smoky taste. It's kind of like a certain... Psh-ah! It's got like this "Ba-boom! Zap!" kind of taste. Don't you think? What would you call that flavor? Lightningy? Yeah! It's lightningy!

215. A blank check with a 19___ pre-printed in the year field. (Do you have one? If so, you should totally send it to me!)

257. A pipe that can both blow bubbles and smoke tobacco. [3 points, 7 bonus points if it can do both at the same time. Double bonus points if it can blow bubbles filled with smoke. As a University of Chicago scholar, you can accomplish this]

258. A tar gun. A feather gun.

260. Build a working lightbulb from scratch.

1008. (ScavOlympics) Life size Battleship®. We'll need six human boat pieces from you, to be divvied up and placed as you wish. You'll need a goodly supply of water balloons.
Comments: 11 smoky flames - light a scarlet candle.

Monday, May 5th, 2008

Subject:motorcycles for gnomes!
Time:12:53 am.
I have made myself a shirt that says the above. Other shirt ideas:
GUNS FOR EVERYONE
STARVING FOR ART
IDEAS ARE FOOLISH. WE SHOULD BAN THEM.

If you think of every hand as an untapped llama, there are billions of llamas out there!

GR: I want to be in a place where I can sleep and hang out at the same time.
JB: That's being dead, isn't it?

[insert image here: a selfish shellfish]

It seems to me that it's rather selfless to watch someone starve to death, if s/he really wants to.


Sudden Poll! Would trying to sell "limited edition shirts" be a viable business model? For instance, I've got some shirts that I've already made, for which I frequently get compliments and that I love all to pieces. Examples include not only the above MOTORCYCLES FOR GNOMES, but also BLAME GOD; YOUR PLAN HAS ONE FATAL FLAW; and $10 FOR THE ANTIDOTE. It occurs to me that I could also adapt some of my previous greeting card ideas into shirts, such as IT'S CANCER (though that one really works best as a greeting card, methinks).

However, I have no interest in making a CafePress shop or anything like that. I like the hand-lettered look, probably not just because of the whole calligraphy thing but because I'm quite arrogant about my conscious efforts not to brand myself with other people's slogans/ideas. But it would be pretty cool to sell Lydia-brand shirts. After all, as this incredibly brilliant article on the brand underground puts it: Perhaps the first lesson of the brand underground is not that savvy young people will stop buying symbols of rebellion. It is that they have figured out that they can sell those symbols, too.

So: what if I make limited edition shirts? Basically, make some shirts with the above slogans by hand -- each subtly different -- and attempt to sell them individually for more money than your normal slogan'd shirt. Maybe do many of them by commission -- for instance, wait for a person to request a certain slogan and put half the money down before actually making the shirt. Sure, if one of my slogans takes off I guess someone might start CafePressing the things (although I suppose I could copyright them? can you do that? not that it'd be that effective if people really wanted to steal the slogans), but then the "originals" will have more cachet. Is this a good idea?

...

Ecuador considers enshrining women's right to sexual pleasure in law
A new inalienable right could be enshrined soon in Ecuador's constitution: the pursuit of sexual happiness for women.
It's funny how "obvious" it is that men don't need a similar provision. Is that true? I mean, the instinct is always to say that it's way easy for men and they don't need any fucking provisions to feel capable of seeking sexual pleasure, you know? But I'm not sure if that has to be true, or it's (at least partly?) bias. We all know that men have a way easier time getting off. And that's gotta be partly biological. But there is a cultural aspect -- it's very difficult for women to determine what they want sexually, not just because it's biologically harder -- and not just because there are far fewer accepted social examples that show women how they can get off (porn largely seems to fulfill this function for men) -- but because the world hammers the lesson into our heads that the real point, the real goal, of sex is for the man to get off. Not for the woman. So I think I do admire this provision, because the more social backing there is that says: "Yes, you do have a right to your own sexual needs and pleasure despite the fact that you're a woman," the fewer women will have an impossible time with understanding and asking for those things. I could go on, but this is probably a whole post in itself.
from [info]miketodd13.

Spiders see love in a different light
For people, ultraviolet B (UVB) is an invisible, cancer-causing ray to be blocked with sunscreen and dark glasses, but for a species of jumping spider, the light sets a romantic mood. In the first evidence of an animal having the ability to see UVB, researchers have found that the ornate jumping spider uses the light in mating displays.
from [info]fleurs_du_mal.

Lesbos islanders dispute gay name
Campaigners on the Greek island of Lesbos are to go to court in an attempt to stop a gay rights organisation from using the term "lesbian".

Cool discussion of the current shift from read-only to participatory media
I was having dinner with a group of friends about a month ago, and one of them was talking about sitting with his four-year-old daughter watching a DVD. And in the middle of the movie, apropos nothing, she jumps up off the couch and runs around behind the screen. ... She started rooting around in the cables. And her dad said, "What you doing?" And she stuck her head out from behind the screen and said, "Looking for the mouse."
Here's something four-year-olds know: A screen that ships without a mouse ships broken. Here's something four-year-olds know: Media that's targeted at you but doesn't include you may not be worth sitting still for. Those are things that make me believe that this is a one-way change. Because four year olds, the people who are soaking most deeply in the current environment ... they just assume that media includes consuming, producing and sharing.

I can't remember where I got this ... though apparently it was posted on BoingBoing.

EveryBlock: a news feed for your block
EveryBlock is a new way to keep track of what’s happening on your block, in your neighborhood and all over your city.
It seems to mostly be crime right now, but methinks it's got a lot of potential to go further.

[Exalted] The best way to deal with Invincible Sword Princess, the hypothetical overpowered Dawn Caste
Assume you're a Sidereal.
You put together a Resplendent Destiny which is "ISP's lovable yet bumbling comic-relief sidekick". Set up a lot of astrology effects to support this.

... and hilarity ensues. I love it when people really get how Sidereals are supposed to work.
from MCP.
Comments: 12 smoky flames - light a scarlet candle.

Monday, April 28th, 2008

Subject:wow, I haven't listened to Nine Inch Nails in ages
Time:12:03 am.
Sudden Poll! This reprises a meme that went around a few years ago:
Post a memory of me in the comments. It can be anything you want.

...

In a moment of madness the other night, I reviewed almost all my LiveJournal entries from my senior year at Simon's Rock. (Well, not exactly a moment of madness ... I was looking for this excellent Mad Libs entry, with which no drugs were involved.) I found some other classic entries that I'm really quite proud of, including:

* My assertion that Bernie, the dean of Simon's Rock, was a myth. He resigned soon after I posted that entry -- coincidence? I think not!
* My account of the best your mom joke ever, a practical joke that I very nearly played on Jake. Skip past the request for creativity to read it. I actually have no idea what happened to those panties; I just hope my dad doesn't like, find them in my room at his apartment ... well, actually, I think he'd just be amused.
* The first entry where I asked everyone to comment with a memory of me.
* My final Simon's Rock nostalgia entry. Aww.
* Special bonus: ethical conundrum of food colouring, from August post-graduation.

The best link I posted all year was probably Myths Over Miami:
Captured on South Beach, Satan later escaped. His demons and the horrible Bloody Mary are now killing people. God has fled. Avenging angels hide out in the Everglades. And other tales from children in Dade's homeless shelters.

I also discovered the following charming note ... Lydia of 2003-04 stated offhandedly:
I have this bizarre guilt sort of thing for not being all perverted. I mean, I'm really not even slightly perverted. It doesn't seem realistic. Shouldn't I be at least a little perverted? Oh well, I'm probably in denial and my capacity for perversion probably surpasses all, mwa ha ha ha.

Side memories:
* I learned today in Ethics of Warfare that nerve gas smells like Juicy Fruit.
* My entire year's priorities were a three-way tie among thesis, gaming and Dustin. Well, it should be a two-way tie -- thesis and gamingDustin.
* Student Life was sure I must have a drug problem because every time they came by, I was asleep (my normal sleep schedule usually involved staying up until at least 5AM) and "seemed confused and dazed all the time". This is especially entertaining because I did fewer drugs than anyone else who lived in my residence hall.

... But the best part may have been the many, many quotations I recorded from my friends.

AlmightyAnus: i mean, honestly, how can someone be that moronic and not manage to kill themselves trying to operate a toilet?
AlmightyAnus: the only problem with people like that is that the bodies don't disappear when you slay them

MsFireCat: oh hey, one of my mom's coworkers saw a photo of me the other day and apparently said, "she has blowjob lips."
God of Archery: [away message] computer in use. but not by me. say hi to my parents!!
MsFireCat: You're just saying that to freak me out.
MsFireCat: Does your mom know what they're saying about her on streetcorners, Adam?
MsFireCat: If she's really on the computer I hope she sees this. it would be funny.
MsFireCat: HEY ADAM'S MOM!!... I did you last night!!!
(extremely long pause)

God of Archery: lydia, thank you. you made my night wonderful.
God of Archery: that was absolutely perfect.
God of Archery: teach you to IM people without reading away messages first
MsFireCat: I'm on AOL, I can't
MsFireCat: I have to IM to get the away message
MsFireCat: I don't care, your mom can hate me permanently, what happened though?
God of Archery: nothing much...she wasn't at the omputer.
God of Archery: but i just laughed myself to a hemmhorage a second ago

Me: Do you have a ruler, Ed?
Ed: No. I find that a good deal of my oblong objects end up getting lost at your mom's house.

Nathaniel: If you snap, and go after some obnoxious, clueless, bitchy, printer-hogging non-senior with an icepick, I'll post bail. Well, okay. I'll print out *my* 270+ page thesis using the newly vacant and slightly bloodstained terminal, *then* post bail. (He and I had a thesis length contest.)

iamsimplyme2001: okay singing nekkid in the rain is not a hobby, though it is a good way to spend your time
MsFireCat: :laugh: man, I haven't done that in soo long
iamsimplyme2001: wow, must be a drought

Sam Ruhmkorff, philosophy professor: (tells us all about his new habit of playing cricket)
Adlai L.: What's the philosophical justification or argument for taking to a game at which you suck?
Sam: Any question with a necessarily false presupposition cannot be legitimately answered in any possible world.

MsFireCat (4:12 AM): my reading comprehension skills have begun to blow (due to the insanity of senior year)
sensorysensation (4:12 AM): oh man, my reading comprehension skills have just gotten fucked up
sensorysensation (4:12 AM): like... Foucault is mad easy
sensorysensation (4:13 AM): but I'm pretty sure if I tried to read a novel
sensorysensation (4:13 AM): I'd explode

Delea: they probably encode lessons in their DNA
Delea: snakes do that
Delea: playing dead is a hereditary trait
MsFireCat: dude
MsFireCat: that's awesome
MsFireCat: so we could encode snake dna in people and make them play dead?
Delea: We'd have to infect everyone with the playing dead virus
MsFireCat: it'd be like "28 Days Later", only mad boring
Delea: zombies would approach, but if you threatened to attack, they'd just fall down

Rebecca: You're like the Pope.
Lydia: What?
Rebecca: Why do people always look confused when I say that?

Mad MacRae (6:19 AM): I noticed the earlier your mom joke but I was startled
MsFireCat (6:19 AM): startled?
Mad MacRae (6:20 AM): It was like watching C-Span and having someone suddenly whip their dick out and slap someone with it and go, "I RESPECTFULLY DISAGREE!"
Mad MacRae (6:20 AM): Startling!
(later)

Mad MacRae (6:26 AM): Your mother is such a Kantian that when she sits around the house she needs to consider the ramifications of everyone in the world sitting around the house and whether or not it would be reasonable

Squiberis (5:26 AM): There are strange sounds coming from the other room...
MsFireCat (5:27 AM): Describe them. 15 words or less
Squiberis (5:28 AM): It's like a rat pretending to be a dryer.




I adopted a cute lil' pikachu fetus from Fetusmart! Hooray fetus!


Lorien Feanturi: i...
Lorien Feanturi: the fetussy thing
MsFireCat: Shocked?
Lorien Feanturi: i hope you have horrible nightmares of big scissors and a llama suspended above your bed
MsFireCat: the llama of damocles?

Well. There you have it, gentlemen. I wonder if any of the people quoted above will see this entry.

...

Texas Polygamist Wives Calendar
Like it says on the tin.
from [info]miketodd13.

Apparently Katherine Hepburn was incredibly awesome.
"If you want to sacrifice the admiration of many men for the criticism of one, go ahead, get married."
"It would be a terrific innovation if you could get your mind to stretch a little further than the next wisecrack."
"I don't care what is written about me so long as it isn't true."


Baen Free Library
Baen Books is now making available — for free — a number of its titles in electronic format. We're calling it the Baen Free Library. Anyone who wishes can read these titles online — no conditions, no strings attached. (Later we may ask for an extremely simple, name & email only, registration. ) Or, if you prefer, you can download the books in one of several formats. Again, with no conditions or strings attached. (URLs to sites which offer the readers for these format are also listed.)
from [info]foolinchrist.

Vladimir Putin Too Sexy for His Kremlin, Eyes Bid for Catwalk
In a rare exhibition of hotness, Russian President Vladimir Putin posed shirtless while vacationing with Prince Albert II of Monaco in the Siberian Mountains. The hunky former KGB heavyweight thrilled an adoring Russian public with his ripped chest, toned arms, and pert breasts.
Initially feigning indifference to the attending press, President Putin then smirked while tearing a Moscow phone directory in half with his bare hands, used a classic judo hip-throw on a Black bear, and then clenched a strap in his teeth to pull a Lada sedan across a creek.


The Metropolitan used to have a fashion blog!
Apparently it's closed now, but their archives are awesome. They always did have crazy awesome old fashion exhibits.
from [info]dvitol, I think.

Nostalgia Digest: the Glory Days of Old Radio
They've got some supercool stuff in the archives.
Comments: 26 smoky flames - light a scarlet candle.

Thursday, April 24th, 2008

Subject:2AM insight of the day
Time:3:00 am.
Discuss:

The idea of "female mystery" -- female sexual mystery, female emotional mystery -- is one of the most damaging cultural concepts for women. It not only leads men to feel like they don't need to bother with understanding women (and often, therefore, with aiding women or contributing to female liberation); it also leads women to feel like they don't have the right to be understood.
Comments: 30 smoky flames - light a scarlet candle.

Monday, April 21st, 2008

Subject:ah, the lyme
Time:2:25 am.
Ideas my housemates and I came up with tonight include (dialogue may be paraphrased):

1. Earplug earrings

Mike: (holding up bag of earplugs) Look at all these earplugs.
Me: Oh my god, can I have some? These are awesome. Whoa, this one is really awesome! I should take a picture!
Lisa: We should rate them!
Me: Yes! We should rate all of them on five-point scales! And then post our findings to the Internet! You know, these earplugs would make some great earrings.
Lisa: Yeah, you could suspend them on your ears from little chains, so that if your coworkers were annoying you then you could just go ahead and stick them in your ears!

2. Celebrity hose water

Basically, we should sneak into celebrities' gardens, fill up bottles with their hose water, and then sell that water for $5 a pop (or more if the celebrity is really huge). Just imagine it: hose water from Madonna's garden, $10 a bottle. We could build up the mystique. Eventually people would be wondering whose garden would be hit next! Having your hose water stolen and sold as bottled water would become a status symbol!

3. Jesus waffle iron

'Nuff said.

4. Greeting Cards by Lydia

Examples include (all of these are in plain lettering, on a plain white background, unless otherwise noted):
* Torture is fun
* You will die
* You will die tonight
* You will die tomorrow

Me: And I'll also make one that says, "It's cancer."
Matthew: How about, "Your dog has cancer"?
Me: Yes, and it can have a happy picture of Lassie running across a sun-soaked field!
Matthew: We could do a whole cancer line!
Me: The final one could just be a postcard that simply says, "Cancer"!


P.S. I'll try to actually call people tomorrow and also respond to old email / livejournal comments. Sorry, I've been holed up in my room gazing with feverish intent upon a writing project since mid-yesterday, except for the time that I went to work today and gazed with feverish intent upon the project using my work computer. (I am an awesome employee.) And before that, Mike T. was visiting for a week and we were dressing up like demons and running about to masculinity lectures and old radio show demonstrations and goth nightclubs, and also I was finally sending off my Peace Corps medical forms (now I get to hurry up and wait to hear whether they think I can be trusted not to have a nervous breakdown in Africa).

P.P.S. Piranha. (Available for $15 on the North Side!)

P.P.P.S. Does anyone have that comic that refers to the Saturday Night Live cowbell sketch + cancer in a genius fashion? I believe the dialogue goes something like this:

Doctor: You've got a fever.
Patient: And the only prescription is more cowbell!
Doctor: No. Cowbell cannot cure any fevers. Especially not cancer. Which you have.

P.P.P.P.S. There will soon be a Bowers House Lecture Series. We'll serve fries and call it "Lectures and Fries". This is not a joke. We're hoping that the first lecture will be this dude speaking on the subject of rat social dynamics.
Comments: 13 smoky flames - light a scarlet candle.

Sunday, April 13th, 2008

Subject:the end of the affair
Time:10:34 pm.
Me and SomethingAwful: A Love Story involving piranha, limericks about my breakup, etc.

Ever since I discovered SomethingAwful, I've had a strange affection for it (who couldn't love a site whose tagline is, "The Internet makes you stupid"?). Housemate Brett recently characterized me as loving SA "to a fault". I can't actually remember what I first read on that site. It may have been their hilarious, though utterly horrifying, hentai game reviews, which brought me closer to resolving never to have sex again than anything else I've ever experienced. Sometime later I found their ingenious responses to legal threats against the site ("I discussed this proposition with my lawyer, and he responded by throwing a pitcher of Tang at my head .... This is his way of saying 'no dice'.") I'd already known of SA for a while when I saw the awesome photoshopped D&D ads ("THAC0 is wacko ... if you're a teen") and the hysterically funny review of the gaming supplement, The Book of Erotic Fantasy ("Given a pad of paper, a pencil, and a year's time I would be hard pressed to come up with a list of three products less needed").

SA charges $10 for accounts on their fora. I never felt much of an urge to actually be a SomethingAwful member until I found myself hanging out with my dear friend Sean a couple years ago, and we spent much time discussing the awesomeness of SA. After hours of this, he offered to buy me an account for my birthday, though he warned me to be careful until I knew the lay of the land because the moderators ban people for just about anything. Referencing jokes that are no longer funny will get you banned, for instance, as will expressing your opinion in a boring or stupid manner.

There are many types of threads on the SA fora; you choose a thread tag when you create a new thread. Example tags include "fruity", "gross", "photoshop" and "comics" as well as plainer things such as "school", "games" or "sex". One thread tag I was always a sucker for is "e/n"; I think it stands for "emotional/neurotic" or something. E/N threads are almost always about breakups, and traditionally go something like this:

1) Someone writes a post describing his/her relationship drama.
2) SA users (known as "goons") comment with vicious mockery, off-colour remarks, psychological deconstruction of the original poster (known as the "OP"), and occasional advice or comfort.
3) If other goons know the OP, they may jump in with commentary that further confuses the issue.
4) The OP ignores any wise advice given them by the audience and does something stupid. Then s/he writes about it and is mocked some more.
5) If the OP is female, then guys start offering to sleep with her.
6) If the e/n thread is particularly scandalous (for instance, "I'm in love with my stepmother and want nothing more than to sleep with her"), then the amateur internet detectives of SA may locate real information about the OP and reveal the thread's existence to concerned parties (for instance, the stepmother). When the concerned parties get involved, this is known as the "drama bomb".

One day, as I was chortling over the memory of an e/n thread on my way to work, I had an idea. What if you had an e/n thread that was also a contest? Like, a contest to see who could make the most ridiculous remark or do the most ridiculous thing (like contact a stepmother)? And what if ... what if there were limericks involved?

I didn't have any drama that I could use for such an e/n thread myself ... but less than a month later, I did! I didn't want to upset Mark by blindsiding him with a thread about our breakup, but I swiftly obtained his permission by email and set out on my mission.

The Contest

I wrote a post of the following title: "Write a Limerick About My Breakup (CONTEST w/ PRIZES)". The prizes were a freeze-dried piranha and a diaphinised frog. I summed up my relationship and subsequent breakup with Mark in an extremely shallow, incomplete and non-detailed manner (which can be shortened to: we had a pretty awesome relationship, but neither of us were sure what was gonna happen in our lives, and when he clearly lost enthusiasm for dating me, I ended it). I cherry-picked details about our lives that I figured would inspire creativity: that we're both long-haired hippies who live in vegetarian co-ops, for instance, and that we're gamers. I nicknamed him Megaman, noted that he was an SA member, and said that I don't know his username but that I wouldn't contradict anyone who pretended to be him. I also noted that I had at one point feared that I was putting too much sexual pressure on him and asked the audience to speculate about my fetishes.

The absolute best entry was this sonnet by username jo3sh, which speculated about exactly that:

Her drive for pleasures carnal drove away
The only man for whom she's ever pined
To grave she takes the sinful secret play
But sets the goons a game to guess the kind

Did Megaman refuse to go downtown?
Or did Shataina pray his butt to peg?
Demanded she he use the highway brown?
Or was it yiff for which she wailed and begged?

Or maybe he preferred a fruity lube
And she asked him that as a special treat
They use some lard instead to wet their pubes
A vegan's dirty, begging, "give me meat!"

A goon's imagination runs amok
In wond'ring how the goon girls like to fuck.


But there were many fine entries. Here are some more, with my favourite at the end: Read more... )

The Aftermath

On Monday, the deadline day, I got to work and found that someone from Chicago (whom I shall refer to as The Creep) had emailed me, proposing that we meet up and he satisfy all my fetishes. Score.

I determined that one of the entries was plagiarized -- a completely incredible, insanely bizarre sestina originally published by McSweeney's: "Subterranean Gnomesick Blues". Housemate Brett and I have become obsessed with the sestina, which I have now painted on the hallway wall, and we began a lively correspondence with the author that may soon merit its own post.

The thread was at 4 pages. The hours ticked away ... I began to contemplate who should win. Then, two hours before the deadline, my account was banned! Holy shit! I had somehow passed into utter and complete e/n notoriety!

The reason posted by the moderator was: "Worst e/n thread I've ever seen." Several people emailed me to say that they definitely didn't think that the thread was the worst ever. I briefly contemplated whether or not I was honour-bound to track down the best limerickers and give them prizes, but The Creep noted that I shouldn't think of myself as owing anyone anything because "it was a thread that resulted in a banning, so ... well, really, that says it all. Collectively, the goons have spoken." Fair enough.

Ah, SomethingAwful. You comforted me when I was down. I'm sorry we had to break up, but I truly think it was the best decision for both of us, and I won't be spending $10 to get my account back. I'll read your front page and smile with nostalgia, and I'll miss all the good times we had together. Goodbye SA! I love you!
Comments: 19 smoky flames - light a scarlet candle.

Sunday, April 6th, 2008

Subject:scrawny antisocial girl, 23, seeks attractive white iBook G4 power cord
Time:11:59 pm.
So, relatively recently my iBook G4 power cord broke and Cate offered me her old one. Now her old one is becoming untrustworthy and I am concerned that it will soon break entirely. I would really rather not shell out the cash required to buy another cord, so I ask you, my friends, if you have recently upgraded from an iBook G4 to a new computer, and might be able to send me your old power cord. I will reimburse your shipping and send you cookies also (ask Cate! it took me a while to send them, but I did, and they were green for St. Patrick's Day too!).

The model I'm seeking looks like this:

Comments: 11 smoky flames - light a scarlet candle.

Friday, April 4th, 2008

Subject:the senator is not available for comment
Time:2:42 pm.
Mark and I broke up again today. It was pretty much mutual again. I'm doing much better than I was last time and am probably willing to talk about it, but not on the Internet. Except maybe on that awesome SomethingAwful thread I've been thinking about having, where I insist on limericks about some heartbreaking event in my life, and give out prizes. Except that I bought him an account for his birthday, so maybe that would be bitchy ... well, I'll get his permission first. Yes! Look for an awesome e/n thread with prizes!

Thursday, April 3rd, 2008

Subject:I'm terribly sexist and I want you to tell me how
Time:5:44 pm.
This post started when I was reviewing my last post and what I'd written at the end of a snippy rant about men who always think women are after them: "Okay yes, I know many men don't have this problem, including probably many guys who will read this; but the ones who do ruined it for the rest of you."

Totally unfair. I know it is. If a man said to me, "Okay yes, I know that many women aren't manipulative gold-digging prostitutes, but the ones who are ruined it for the rest of you," I'd be pretty upset.

And then my thoughts went to a conversation I was having with my friend Igor and Housemate Lisa the other night. Vaginal plastic surgery came up, and the ensuing conversation went something like this (I am liberally paraphrasing because I don't remember our exact words, and I apologize if anyone feels that they are misquoted):

Me: Argh, as if women needed something else to be insecure about!
Igor: That's not fair. Men are insecure too.
Me: Yeah, but only about penis size. Women are insecure about absolutely everything that has anything to do with body image. Including our vaginas, now, argh.
Igor: That's not fair. Men are insecure about body image too. Why don't you just say, "As if people needed something else to be insecure about"?
Lisa: Okay, it's reasonable to say that men are insecure as well, but the fact is that it manifests in different ways. Sure, men may be 25% of the population with eating disorders, but that still means that 75% of people who have eating disorders are women.

I guess that's sort of what a lot of these arguments come down to: "Who is the problem worse for?" Sure, everyone is insecure about body image, but it's obviously worse for women; so is there some way in which men aren't "allowed" to complain? No, of course not. But ....

The body image thing is a good example, because it's not only worse for women; women get less reassurance about it. One of the big morals of the story, for American culture, is that women have to be beautiful to succeed. Sure, a woman can also be smart or tough or perseverant, but if she's not also somewhat attractive, people aren't going to be real happy about the rest of it. You see relatively unattractive male politicians, media stars, etc. all the time, but female? When was the last time you saw an unattractive actress? Even when an actress is called to play an unattractive role, it's always an attractive actress with a fat suit or something (Kidman in "The Hours" is another good example). Hillary Clinton may be frequently lambasted for her unattractiveness, but she's not especially -- she's just not gorgeous. On the other hand, there are a fair number of male actors / politicians / whatever who are not especially attractive (sure, few are outright ugly, but let's just say that the bar's a lot lower for men).

Additionally, in terms of direct attractiveness body-image-wise, men get a whole lot of reassurance. Who hasn't heard the motto "Size doesn't matter"? When was the last time you saw or heard a woman talking about how a man had to meet certain physical requirements to be her mate, as opposed to social ones ("I just want a man with a sense of humour", etc -- Jessica Rabbit, anyone)? Compare that to the last time you heard or saw a man talking about how looks don't matter. Can you even think of any men you know who would say that looks don't matter? I can't. But I can think of lots of women who would say it.

There's something important there. Yes, a man can have appearance issues, but a man's faulty appearance is far less likely to cost him a job or a girlfriend. Appearance is more important for women. That's the problem. No one will argue (at least not after a minimum of thought) than men don't feel insecure about their appearance; and anyone who does is missing the point. The point is not that everyone isn't insecure, it's that women have more to feel insecure about. It's that women can actually be totally screwed by being ugly; for men, it's a much smaller hurdle to overcome. It's that a woman's "total value" is far more based on her attractiveness.

But this is a tangent. I started with catching myself in a sexist remark. And I guess that's where I have to re-start: I hate the sexism I see in myself. I hate the fact that I'm actually more likely to stereotype about "men" than many of the men I know are to stereotype about "women". How did this happen to me? I catch it every once in a while, but I feel like I dismiss and forget the lesson soon after I notice it. Why?

Well, it's hard not to be resentful of the "powerful group" when you're an "oppressed group". Maybe that resentment partly comes out in a tendency to try and do what they're doing "right back at them". So men will stereotype me as weak, dumb, high-maintenance, etc.? Fine, then I'll stereotype them. So maybe getting past the rage is step one. Easier said than done.

Maybe it's partly that there are very few cultural messages about not stereotyping men. In America, we're frequently told about how wrong it is to stereotype women or be misogynist, but there aren't very many commentators who talk about not stereotyping men. (One problem may be that men who are willing to talk about this tend be be misogynist assholes -- you will notice this on any Internet forum -- which means that they automatically lose the argument; their words are automatically discounted.) I want a commentator, a cultural movement, that starts with the statement: "Yes, women have it much worse," and goes on to say: "But male stereotypes suck too." I want a cultural movement that integrates both sides of gender studies -- doesn't just talk about "women's studies" or whatever you would call men's studies.

Feminist women often talk about "men" in disparaging, we're-all-women-here tones. Even the most feminist woman can easily switch from a conversation about how she feels like her relationship expresses certain gender stereotypes, to sighing about how a man will fuck anything that walks. I want to overcome that. I want to be someone who can discuss how much current gender dynamics suck without moving from there to an assumption than all men long for nothing but sleeping with blonde Playboy bunnies.

Maybe another problem is that more men, I think, participate thoughtlessly in their own problematic stereotypes than women do. I mean, it sucks that I assume that all men want to bang blonde Playboy bunnies more than they want a serious relationship with an intelligent woman. But on the other hand, how many men would look at a big Playboy bunny poster and not say, "That's hot; I'd totally do her"? (Who aren't gay?)

But is it a stereotyped group's responsibility to actively reject all stereotypes? From here I'd get into complicated territory about whether women should never get plastic surgery, whether women should allow men to pay for dinner, etc. I'll skip that line of thought. I guess the bottom line is that I feel that I'm sexist and it bothers me. I'll end this somewhat incoherent diatribe with a

Sudden Poll: Men: What stereotypes do you feel unfairly pigeonhole you, as a man?
Women: What kind of stereotyping anti-male moments have you caught yourself in?
Comments: 47 smoky flames - light a scarlet candle.

Subject:someday there'll be a computer program that recognizes songs stuck in my head from melody snippets
Time:4:36 pm.
Lots of random stuff to post. This post will be recipes.

Incredibly Awesome and Easy Caramel Brownies

These are seriously almost the best thing I have ever tasted, and the only things that beat them require way more work to make. Apparently they were invented by [info]styletax; I was provided the recipe by [info]igor_47 via [info]cruft.

2 boxes German chocolate cake mix
6 ounces chocolate chips
1 pound caramels (wrapped)
1.5 cups melted butter
1 cups evaporated milk

Preheat oven to 350F.

Mix 1 box of cake mix with 1/3 c evaporated milk and 3/4 cup (1.5 sticks) melted butter. Mix by hand (using a wooden spoon works best) until the mix takes on a doughy look.

Spread mix on the bottom of a greased 9x13 pan using your hands. Bake for 6 minutes.

Unwrap caramels and melt in saucepan with 1/3 cup evaporated milk until smooth. Take brownie pan out of oven after it has set and pour caramel evenly over the layer. Sprinkle on chocolate chips.

Mix second box of cake mix like the first and spread by hand over the caramel layer. The best way to do this is to make small flattened globs of dough and set them on top of the caramel layer, since the caramel will be too hot to touch.

Bake at the same temperature for additional 20 minutes. The top layer of dough will spread out as it bakes, though leaving some spaces will let the caramel peek through.

Delicious Georgian Recipes

These are from my friend John's copy of The Georgian Feast by Darra Goldstein, which apparently is a really awesome resource for Georgian culture as well as food, and is available at Bookfinder.com for $11 and up. Together, these recipes make a brilliant meal.

Garlic fried chicken

3 pounds chicken in piece
salt
freshly ground black pepper
2 tablespoons butter
1 tablespoons vegetable oil
10-12 cloves garlic
1 cup walnuts
1 cup water

Season chicken with salt and pepper.

Heat butter + oil in skillet. Fry chicken on medium high heat for 10 min; turn, fry 10 min more. Cover pan, continue cooking for 20-25 min till done.

Finely grind walnuts and garlic.

When chicken is tender, keep warm on plate; pour off all but 4 tbsp of drippings. Add ground stuff and water. Sprinkle on 1/4 tsp salt. Simmer 5 min. Coat chicken, heat, serve.

Ed. note: I made this with tofu instead of chicken, which works okay; I suspect chicken would be better. When making with tofu, you probably want more of the walnut mixture per pound of tofu, and more salt.

Yogurt spinach

1 pound spinach
2 leafy sprigs cilantro (we used fresh dill and it was delicious)
1 garlic clove, peeled and roughly chopped
pinch salt
1 cup yogurt

Wash spinach and cook covered 5 min. Drain thoroughly, squeeze out extra moisture with hands, mince.

Mortar / pestle together cilantro, garlic, salt. Beat into yogurt, add spinach, serve chilled.

...

Science proves that men misread and misinterpret female interest!
Who knows whether this study is reasonable. It's pretty vague and has some possible interpretation flaws, so it may tell us more about "what researchers are looking to prove" than "what researchers can prove". It reminds me of one thing that drives me crazy, though, viz.: when guys tell me that "chicks hit on me so much more when I'm taken". Actually, my friend, what's happening is that women know that you're taken and think that they don't have to give you the cold shoulder. One of the biggest girl lessons is that men will interpret just about anything as a come-on, so if you want to be careful about not giving the wrong impression, you have to practically act like an ice queen. If the guy's taken (or the situation is otherwise one in which you think you can relax more), you think, "Wow, I can actually smile at this guy every once in a while!" Which is stupid, because then the guy goes home to his girlfriend thinking, "Man, if I just dumped my girlfriend that chick would totally fuck me!" I have seen this happen too many times. Argh. Okay yes, I know many men don't have this problem, including probably many guys who will read this; but the ones who do ruined it for the rest of you. edit I wrote a follow-up post to this statement! /edit

Hilarious decree: Chattanooga Sends Truck Load Of Water To Atlanta
The best part about this is the exact wording of the decree at the bottom.
from [info]ejgrgunner I think.

How a carpenter got the highest Scrabble score ever
The first thing I thought when Mike sent me this was, it's sort of funny that Scrabble experts are so het up about this. I mean, Scrabble is not an incredibly hard game to master. Its probabilities are pretty straightforward; being kinda good at it is mostly a matter of a large vocabulary and some basic math skills, while being incredibly good at it comes down to memorizing huge lists of words. But people seem to be all upset that a more risky strategy than the boring orthodox one might set all these tournament records. I mean, what exactly is wrong with that again? They're mad because someone who took bigger chances than they would, and played a game less perfect than a computer, won big? In their world, only people who are lucky enough to pull the perfect variation of tiles and then play them with perfect strategy should score big -- not people who take risks? The whole point of taking risks is that sometimes you win bigger than you would if you played a perfect game.
from [info]miketodd13.

Miss Bimbo: virtual "fashion" game
Welcome to Miss Bimbo. Enter the exciting world of the first ever, virtual fashion game! Become the most famous, beautiful, sought after bimbo across the globe!
* Find a fun job to pay for your needs and all the clothes a Bimbo could possibly want.
* Shop for the latest fashions and become the trendsetting bimbo in town!
* Become a socialite and skyrocket to the top of fame and popularity.
* Date that famous hottie you've had your eye on and show the Bimbo world the social starlet you are!
* Even resort to meds or plastic surgery. Stop at nothing to become the reigning bimbo!

Maybe the best part about this is that their iconic bimbo is shown in a wedding dress and Playboy bunny ears. Are bimbos like modern-day courtesans? Like, do you suppose they occupy similar cultural space? I always thought of bimbos as rather low-class, but maybe that's a bias from my upbringing rather than a general cultural bias.
from Conrad H., indirectly.

Comments on when you should give up on being a writer
The original post is mostly posing the "when should you give up?" question; the comments are the interesting part.
from [info]alanajoli, I think.
Comments: 20 smoky flames - light a scarlet candle.

Thursday, March 20th, 2008

Subject:Roxanne, you don't have to put on that red light
Time:12:34 am.
Notwithstanding my (possibly in bad taste) joke at the beginning of my last entry, I have actually been devoting some serious thought to the Eliot Spitzer scandal.

Spitzer, for those who aren't as fully in the loop as a New Yorker might be, became famous as an extremely ethical Attorney General. He went after the fat cats, for instance -- Wall Street doubtless cracked open some serious champagne bottles upon hearing of his political demise. And, in fact, he spent quite a lot of time breaking up prostitution rings (yes, he broke up more than one!). He was voted in as Governor because he had such a badass, such an amazingly ethical record.

So what are we to make of the fact that he was busted hiring a prostitute for thousands of dollars per hour? And, in fact, apparently had a habit of hiring such prostitutes? Apparently, Spitzer's expensive prostitute habit cost him somewhere around $80-100k (that sounds like a lot, but when you think about it, how many hours of Ashley Alexandra Dupré's time does it even buy? maybe one day? -- let's call it 24-48 total hours). This seems especially crazy when you consider the fact that Spitzer himself pushed to instate higher penalties for the patrons of prostitutes (hereafter referred to as johns).

I haven't fully brought all my thoughts together, so I'll take the numbered approach.

1) Do I think Spitzer did a bad thing? Yes. I think he betrayed his wife. Her expression during his speech made it more than clear that Mr. Spitzer did not clear his activities with Mrs. Spitzer ahead of time. So, he betrayed his wife. And that's a bastardly thing to do. Period.

1a) However, betraying one's wife -- while a bastardly thing to do -- does not make someone into an irredeemably Bad Person. If he were younger and hotter and had lots of stuff in common with me, would I marry him? Hell no. And I wouldn't advise another woman to marry him, either. And if I were friends with his wife, I would damn well spit in his face. And if I were his wife, I would either shoot him in the head, or divorce him as soon as possible; certainly I would never forgive him -- he cheated in a prolonged, premeditated, dishonest and even risky (STI-wise) fashion. But still, the act of cheating on his wife does not intrinsically make him a horrible man. It doesn't even, necessarily, make him an unethical man.

1b) Just as a side note, isn't it funny how so many people who quickly leapt to Bill Clinton's defense during Monicagate are shifting their feet and pulling back from Eliot Spitzer?

2) Do I think Spitzer was a hypocrite? Maybe. I've thought over and over about what was going through his head. Did his urge to punish johns come from a deep-seated guilt? Did his dogged work against prostitution rings also arise partly from that deep-seated guilt?

2a) I doubt it. Why? Because, as was best summed up by my friend Zach (who once interned with Spitzer), "the hooker rings he busted as an AG were more of the human trafficking variety than the $5000/hr variety." In other words, the prostitution that Spitzer cracked down on was closer to rape / abuse / sex slavery than it was to a white, educated, English-speaking American citizen freely consenting to have sex for money. And, of course, the johns he thought deserved punishment were doing something a lot more analogous to paying for rape than paying for consensual sex.

3) Do I feel bad for Ashley Alexandra Dupré, a.k.a. Kristen? Hell no -- at least not for the prostitution thing. Let's look at her lifestyle: she had a flat in Manhattan whose rent was literally thousands of dollars per month; the building has a pool, a gym, and God knows what else. And let's look at her profession: struggling singer.

She's clearly not an idiot -- her MySpace page is impressively free of grammatical errors and stupidity -- and she's goddamn beautiful. It would have been extremely easy for her to support herself, perhaps a bit less extravagantly, with a "real" job. For instance, she could have chosen to live in a less costly place and take a part-time job in order to support herself while she worked on her art. It wouldn't even have been that bad -- after all, that's pretty close to what I'm doing, and my life is pretty awesome. But instead, she chose to have sex for thousands of dollars per hour. That is not even close to tragic.

4) Do I think that Eliot Spitzer is a scumbag for paying Ashley Alexandra Dupré to have sex with him? Absolutely not. In fact, I think that Eliot Spitzer probably drew on his vast experience as Attorney General to find prostitutes who were not pressured into becoming prostitutes -- who were not raped -- who were not trafficked. In other words, he specifically went to the most ethical possible prostitute.

5) The Smoking Gun has released some pages from the affidavit that have an interestingly close focus on Client 9, Eliot Spitzer. So what were the investigator's priorities, exactly? Here's another quotation from Zach for you: "What were federal investigators doing monitoring a state government official to check for bribery?" And right in an election year! I mean, I'm not saying that he didn't do it, but I am saying that this is a bit of a convenient scandal. edit Okay, so I wasn't super well-informed before, but now I am better informed. It seems that the Feds deliberately pulled out all the stops on Spitzer (including calling in multiple 12+-member shadow teams, etc). Their justification for this is "Well, we wouldn't normally put so much effort into breaking up a prostitution ring, but with such a highly placed politician we had to put more effort into discovering wrongdoing." Riiiight .... /edit

6) Does this case make me angry? Yes, it does -- but not because I'm all that mad at Eliot Spitzer, even though he did a bastardly thing.

As always, I'm angry at the media. The papers, TV, etc. are treating this case as if it's all about insane hypocrisy -- he brought down prostitution and yet patronized prostitutes! gasp! -- when a minimum of reflection will show that Eliot Spitzer was not patronizing the kind of prostitutes whose activities he aimed to take down. There's a huge difference between (a) an illiterate downtrodden woman whose pimp beats her, rapes her and takes all her money ... and (b) Ashley Alexandra Dupré. There's a world of difference. Eliot Spitzer was patronizing the second, not the first -- and it really says something about how fucked up Americans are, that everyone seems to think that patronizing the second is practically the same as the first.

The distinction is more than just important. It's crucial. Apparently, most Americans consider Ashley Alexandra Dupré to be just as victimized as your average street whore -- or, conversely, they consider your average street whore to be just as empowered as Ashley Alexandra Dupré. The failure to grasp the difference is at the heart of much current commentary on this issue.

Furthermore, the same Americans who brushed off Bill Clinton's routine unfaithfulness are hissing and spitting at Eliot Spitzer's scarce, consensual, non-emotionally-engaging unfaithfulness. In fact, New York -- which failed to punish Giuliani for his flagrant, corrupt, continuing affairs -- is forcing Spitzer to step down for 24-48 hours of sex.

7) I am probably somewhat influenced by the crazy fantasy series I have been reading lately (a somewhat ridiculous set of books by Jacqueline Carey whose main character is an extreme S&M courtesan chosen by the gods -- the first half of the first one, Kushiel's Dart, is awesome and filled with well-written complex intrigue; the rest of the first one and all of the succeeding ones seem to have devolved into less interesting, less complicated, travel-focused fantasy; anyway I do recommend the first one, though you have to be able to handle some BDSM-y scenes). But ... wouldn't it be nice if prostitution wasn't viewed as a degrading horrible thing? Wouldn't it be fantastic if selling one's body was viewed as, not just reasonable, but respectable -- even, perhaps, holy?

The fact that a woman selling sex is seen as such an awful thing tells us a lot about how sex is viewed in general. If we didn't see sex as something that women ought to be avoiding as much as possible in the first place, then we wouldn't be so horrified by the idea of women doing it for something as crass as money. I've no idea how to fix this one, but it bothers me.

8) (By the way, if you're interested in a really well-thought-out, balanced, feminist look at the issue of prostitution and legalization, please please read this excellent interview from Feministe.com: Interview with the Sex Workers Project in NYC. A lot of the comments are awesome, too.)
Comments: 36 smoky flames - light a scarlet candle.

Saturday, March 15th, 2008

Subject:and now I know I've fallen, fallen for her
Time:2:45 am.
I'm one year older than the prostitute who wrecked Eliot Spitzer. Man, I need to get cracking, don't I?

Berlin: Third and Last Entry!

Some of my photos have date stamps, because I'm dumb. Anyone know if there's an easy way to remove a date stamp? I have one particularly nice graveyard photo at dusk that would be much better without the stamp.

The comments on the last entry demonstrate that everyone loves döner kebabs. Here's a photo of the best döner place I saw:



The gentlemen in the photo (besides Trevor) were nothing more than poor, innocent Turks who were quite bewildered by my sudden 3.30AM appearance -- shouting enthusiastic things about döner kebabs, giggling wildly, and brandishing a camera. I think my companions told them (as well as the place's owner) that I'm from Iceland and that's why I'm crazy, but I'm not sure.

As given me by Francesca the Italian (and baked for me as well, with almonds and nutella for frosting), here's the world's best chocolate cake:

3 eggs
200 grams chocolate
150 grams sugar
"1 vanillin" ... maybe 1 teaspoon vanilla?
3 spoons milk
3 spoons flour
100 grams butter

1. Melt butter and chocolate in a double boiler. Set aside to cool.
2. Separate the eggs. Mix the yolks with sugar. Add milk, vanillin, flour.
3. Whip the egg whites and add to the rest.
4. Bake at 180° (Celsius) for 30 minutes. (It doesn't especially rise, so don't expect it to.)

Is that easy or what? She even kindly served it to a bunch of us while we played Settlers of Catan. (If I move to Berlin, man, I'll be able to play board games way more often than I do here!)

Trevor showed me some Serbian currency. Guess who's on it?



I am way too proud that I recognized Tesla almost immediately. He's not that obscure; I shouldn't be so pleased with myself.

Some of Berlin's bears! )

The Botanisher Garten! )

Much much architecture! Older stuff first, then some cool newer stuff. )

Of bishonen stamps and postcard projects. )

Well, that's a wrap, I think. A few more cool things I photographed, and that's as much as I'll post, gentle readers! I hope that people besides my mother enjoyed my Berlin series.

An exciting contraption Trevor and I passed in the street:



A neat straw-woven dress we spotted in a shop window! I would totally wear this.



An elaborate font style I saw on a shop sign. Berlin's shops do more than I thought possible with gothic lettering.



Even German signal lights are aggressive. I wouldn't want to be on the wrong side of these.



But seriously, not to joke too much about Germans, even if they do it themselves. I had a great time in Berlin, and I can't wait to return.
Comments: 18 smoky flames - light a scarlet candle.

Friday, March 14th, 2008

Subject:and though she will mess up your life, you want her just the same
Time:5:43 pm.
Well! I'm back in Chicago. I'm glad to be home, jetlag and all. I feel a little weak, but I think that's just because of recent digestive problems, which will no doubt solve themselves now that I'm back in a vegetarian co-op. I irrationally miss some nectarines that I purchased in Germany and meant to eat on the plane, which were sniffed out by a small dog and confiscated by U.S. Customs.

Ah, Berlin!

Despite my excitement, currywurst was not amazing -- and I even went to one place the Blue Guide said was the best in Berlin! The currywurst wasn't bad, of course; just not as transcendent as I had hoped. Le sigh. Döner kebabs, on the other hand, are pretty great -- they're fresh-mixed meat-and-salad-filled packets of bread, miles better than any possible American fast food -- though they are made with long-left-out Turkish meat, which I suspect may have been partly responsible for my upset stomach. And maracuja nectar is delicious.

There is an amazing spa right on the banks of the Spree River (Trevor referred to it as "the Badeschiff", which seems to be a general German word indicating "heated clean pool placed in the middle of a river"). There's a bar and stuff, and a sauna, but the really exciting part is the pool. It's right in the river, and you can swim up to the edges and reach your hand over to dip it into the Spree if you feel like it. I failed to make friends with a duck from the chlorinated safety of the pool, but I did get an amazingly beautiful view of the city along the river, at night, while swimming. Trevor's friends and I left at midnight and tried to find a place to eat; this took us rather a long time, including a few false starts, like White Trash Fast Food (I think that's their site, anyway).



From the front, it has an awning that says: WHITE TRASH in big serious letters, and then below it in classy script, FAST FOOD. Inside, we walked past a couple dancing to the swing-dance-ish music and claimed a table. The décor, I fear, doesn't really come across in the picture. It's a reasonably excellent hodgepodge of Chinese lanterns and other Chinese-ish furniture, plus random pictures like that duck. The menu exhorts you to call the waittress "baby". And the food looked fabulous -- absurd steak fries, delicious burgers, etc. etc. Unfortunately we couldn't eat any of it, because it was 1.30AM on a Sunday and the kitchen had closed. Next time.

Man, sometimes I hate starting these Look-I-Had-A-Trip entries. It half-feels like a chore. I know I'll be happy when I'm done, though. When I was having dinner with some family friends in Berlin, they told me that they'd found some 40-year-old letters and were amazed by all the details and observations in them. At least half those notes, they said, had gone unremembered. There's a humbling example. And it's easy to lose photos when they go unprocessed ... I'm not even sure where my Berkeley Asian museum photographs are. All that inspiration, mislaid? It can't be so!

An hour or two past nightfall on Saturday, I was on the way to a club to meet a friend when I came upon a large open-doored church, with a charming row of small lit candles and some earnest young Christians out front. One handsome young man approached me and asked -- in English, of course, English being the lingua franca (that phrase might be a bit ironic) -- if I would like to come in, then offered me a candle to light for someone I was concerned for. I said that I was meeting a friend, but that otherwise I would visit, and asked if there were visiting hours. He invited me to Mass the next day but explained that the church was normally closed for fear of thieves; still, he insisted that I take the candle home and light it. I was touched by this gesture (it reminded me of Unitarian candles of love and concern), and later lit the candle for women in Congo. What a sweet way to do outreach.

Notwithstanding the example of the church, Berlin is a remarkably safe city. This is especially interesting because it's so poor -- why aren't more people being mugged? My family friend Marek, who lives there, noted that this is probably mostly because there's very little actual race/class tension in Germany. Of course, graffiti is still quite prevalent -- maybe more prevalent than any other place I've ever seen. I like graffiti! )

Marek (who has spent lots of time in the States) had something interesting to say about Americans, too. I had told him of my Peace Corps aspirations, and then noted that the outside-world awareness of the Europeans I'd met made me feel small-minded. After all, they all know about the elections in America etc., but I hardly know anything about Germany or European politics in general. Marek pointed out that, while this was true, I do know something about Africa. He said that he feels that American newspapers have far better world coverage than German newspapers do, that Germans occupy themselves with news of America and largely ignore news of the Third World; and he said that while of course there are small-minded Americans, he considers educated Americans to be much broader-minded than educated Germans.

Germans are pretty rude and blunt. I mean, I'm known for being rude and blunt (or at least I have been in the past; I think I may have toned down in my old age), and damn. Marek said that he thinks shopkeepers expect shouting matches rather than meekness when they act snippy. One good example might be the time I took this picture:



... at which point the guy behind the counter lectured me (in English) for like two whole minutes about how I should have asked first. He seemed nonplussed when I apologized several times, and finally dismissed me rather sniffily. It was definitely the rudest reaming-out for being rude that I ever received, and I've received some rude ones.

Before I get into further commentary and pictures, allow me to prove that I was totally not lying when I talked about "iSmoke" ads on my last Berlin entry:



Lucky Strike is so getting sued.

Squats in Berlin! )

The Tacheles gallery, and the Pergamon museum, esp. its Assyrian collection! )

Sculptures! )

Oh man, I think I need to make this a two-entry series. Next entry: the best chocolate cake recipe ever; a bunch of architecture photos; postcard wildness; the Berlin botanical garden; and some other stuff.

I am coming back, for sure. Things to do when I return to Berlin:

* See other museums, particularly Checkpoint Charlie, which is supposed to be great.
* Actually eat at White Trash Fast Food.
* Walk around Prenzlauerberg, which is the neighbourhood I heard the most about that I missed entirely.
* Track down that church where the young man offered me a candle, and maybe even attend Mass.
* Visit a wagenplatz that has shows, or a cinema, or a bar, or something. Perhaps the one that the other wagenplatz directed us to.
* Put together an incredible meal from the Turkish Market, which had cheese-stuffed artichokes and three zillion kinds of hummus / cream spread and spinach-and-feta-filled bread and seventy zillion kinds of olives and was generally amazing.
* Make music with Trevor, either before or after we build a stage in his living room (yeah, I told him about Moomers, the best apartment ever).
* Get Trevor to show me the reddest thing in Berlin (we didn't get to it) and figure out what the most creatively literate thing in Berlin is (we had some ideas, but nothing exciting).
Comments: 10 smoky flames - light a scarlet candle.

Thursday, March 13th, 2008

Subject:final Berlin entry coming soon
Time:12:50 pm.
But for now, a Sudden Poll!

1) Have you ever heard of The Rules?
2) Do you think you could have summed it up before you clicked on the Wikipedia link?
3) QC: What is your age/sex/nationality?
Comments: 22 smoky flames - light a scarlet candle.

Saturday, March 8th, 2008

Subject:this entry brought to you by jetlag
Time:5:01 am.
I just want to be able to sleep at 4.20 AM, argh! (Vivid memory from my childhood: one of the cartoons my parents had taped to the pantry/refrigerator featured a lady with hair curlers lying tucked up in bed with a newspaper, next to a werewolf. The caption was -- Lady: "Well, it doesn't look like jetlag to me.")

Oh well.

This means I can hash out some of my Recent Thoughts on Jealousy.

I was quite young when I first started reading Heinlein, and I directly blame Stranger in a Strange Land for some of the complexes I struggled with when I started dating. * The chapter on how jealousy is unpleasant, relationship-destructive, and just plain wrong messed me up for years. I was persuaded, and I spent ages trying to convince myself not to be jealous, because it was wrong. When men I was dating implied that my jealousy was somehow invalid, stupid, or crazy, I was easily convinced because I was already so ashamed. Needless to say, this made relationships where I consistently felt jealous much harder to negotiate. When people saw the jealousy I felt as normal, I felt briefly comforted -- but had trouble accepting that comfort, because I heard no "rational" arguments justifying my feelings.

Generally, when one tries to discuss jealousy with a given person, that person will display one of two opinions.

a) The Heinlein approach: Jealousy is 100% negative. Examples of such a person's reactions range from disgusted looks to cutting comments such as, "You don't own your significant other." This is problematic because it leads to cases like me -- people who are filled with this very powerful emotion, but can't deal with it because they feel so ashamed. I think that, much like your average militant polyamorous asshole or other militant [alternative sexuality] type, Heinlein types are particularly vehement -- because they feel as though they have to "push" their views in an unfriendly society.

b) The camp that I think is in line with general social norms: Jealousy is 100% normal and acceptable. Examples of such a person's reactions range from "That's completely okay, honey -- if you just try to communicate that, then it's your partner's fault if they don't understand!" to "Well that's obviously a normal way to react, and your significant other is being a big jerk by making you feel that way!" (Courts of law have accepted extreme jealousy as a "reason" for extreme violence; juries have even brushed off murders performed in a jealous rage -- for instance, a spouse shooting their partner when the partner is caught in bed with someone else.) I think that, while it can be comforting to hear "You're okay! Everything's okay!", this approach isn't ideal because it doesn't encourage us to think about what jealousy means to us or where it comes from. And obviously it's bad to unquestioningly validate an emotion that's been known to lead to stuff like, you know, murder. Many evolutionary psychology types fall roughly in this camp.

secret option c) Some thoughtful people subscribe to the "jealousy is a warning sign" philosophy. As spelled out in the excellent alt.polyamory FAQ, this goes something like: [jealousy is] a signal that something [in the relationship] needs investigation and care, much [like] depression or pain. But while this is sometimes somewhat accurate, it's a really incomplete approach. It doesn't acknowledge that jealousy can, frankly, be kinda fun. In a certain way, it neuters the passion and immediacy of jealousy. And jealousy -- need it be said? -- is a very, very powerful passion.

I have noticed, in my own and others' relationships, that jealousy is often accepted as somewhat "nice" or "pleasurable" -- even encouraged, in a certain way that isn't actually harmful. But, while many many people use jealousy in a pleasurable way, most don't think about it.

Personally, for instance -- I don't really mind feeling at least a little jealous if my partner understands what I'm looking for when I express it, viz: expressions of passion / love / devotion. Frankly, if I don't feel a little jealous of my partner when -- say -- there's an obvious attraction between him and someone else, then that's at least as bad a sign as me falling into a jealous rage.

An equally good example is the fact that I like feeling as though my lover is jealous. If I'm dating someone who doesn't get jealous (or who gets jealous but won't be direct and honest about it, which is the worst of all possible worlds!), then I feel less valued -- less desired -- less loved.

I like the passion of jealousy, and the way it intensifies other passions. I like the suppressed violence of jealousy. I like the competitive edge. I like the connotations of ownership, even, and the power games that go along with jealousy. All of these things, of course, as long as they don't get out of hand. Sometimes I think "jealousy usage" practically belongs in the pantheon of BDSM.

But, of course, we all know that jealousy gets very dark very fast; it's playing with fire. It's very easy to go too far, with jealousy -- for instance, if you tell your jealous lover that someone else was all over you, but don't follow up with assurances that you were thinking only of your lover and that you rejected the someone else, then you are asking for relationship trouble. In my mind, this is somewhat analogous to, say, crossing a partner's sexual boundary without asking or trying to be sensitive about the details.

Conclusion: Jealousy is a kink (like everything else). It's really only unpleasant when it takes a nonconsensual form. Unfortunately, nearly no one thinks of it this way. People don't approach discussions about jealousy in a "here's how I feel about it" way, they approach them in a "my way is the most enlightened" way -- or, worse, in a "my way or the highway" way.

I certainly don't think that it would be great if jealous people went around giving their jealousy free rein. Jealousy is, indeed, sometimes a problem, and sometimes it needs to be reined in. Once you get to the point of extreme distrust or non-consensual violence, the jealousy has obviously long been badly out of control. But lust can be a problem, lust sometimes needs to be reined in, and lust is not an evil thing either. It just requires some care and reciprocal sensitivity.

I am certainly the first to admit that I get pretty damn jealous. And it is not an emotion with which I am completely easy in my mind. However, I will also point out that in relationships where my partner understood jealousy and knew how to handle it when I was jealous, my jealousy has far more rarely been a problem than it was in relationships where my partner refused to acknowledge / accept my jealousy.

* I really hate Heinlein sometimes. I can't even read most of his books without screaming in irritation. I frequently recommend The Moon is a Harsh Mistress as a fabulous and accessible instance of anarchist literature, but the man is so sexist ... and unwilling to consider alternative viewpoints ... and often refuses to present arguments that aren't phrased in an unbelievably one-sided way and argh.

...

Everyone probably already knows that Gary Gygax died.
I have never seen one obituary cited by so many people on my Friends page.
The single best tribute is from XKCD. Of course.

The Oldest Game: Hillary vs. Obama
Only for people who like both politics and comics.
another thing several people posted.

Followup to Garfield Minus Garfield: Assorted Garfield panels arranged randomly!
These are also funnier than the original comics were.
from [info]crywolf.

1 in 3 survey respondents noted having emailed a love letter
Take that, personal information nazis!
Also, 1 in 3 male survey respondents considered it reasonable to break up via email (as compared with 1 in 7 female). Wow.

"Love detector" phones
The world is already cyberpunk. But these don't sound very accurate ....

Scientists Find Solar System Like Ours
Astronomers say they have found a miniature version of our own solar system 5,000 light years across the galaxy — the first planetary system that really looks like our own, with outer giant planets and room for smaller inner planets.

Completely ridiculous and often filthy-minded captions for circa 1940s line drawings
Some are hilarious, but for many you will need a strong stomach.
from [info]cogshiftingman.

Fine custom handmade hourglasses
Including a history of hourglasses, too!
Comments: 26 smoky flames - light a scarlet candle.

Thursday, March 6th, 2008

Subject:there's a sign on the wall, but she wants to be sure
Time:3:33 am.
Sorry if you emailed me and I haven't answered. Ten thousand people apparently decided that the best time to get in touch with me was right when I left the country. I'll answer email as I can.

I'm having a pretty excellent time in Berlin so far. I haven't done much high-culture stuff, but I'll visit a museum or two. I've mostly been walking around, making grandiose artistic plans and doing low-culture stuff.

There's a transit strike on. It doesn't affect all the trains (it's complicated, but basically they're run by different companies -- the second might strike next week, and if both companies strike at the same time then Berlin will really be in trouble and I'll be totally screwed for getting to the airport). This means I do far more walking than I otherwise would and can't stay out incredibly late -- the walking isn't too bad, and the not staying out late is unfortunate but not impossible to deal with. Still, for the day or so that I enjoyed the public transit, I was quite impressed. Even the buses run on time -- to the minute. And it's all quite clean and nice. What's weird is that it seems to function despite the fact that at least half the people I've met don't bother paying for public transit. Conductors on the trains apparently "check tickets" (but don't actually do so), and while you're supposed to show tickets to bus drivers, they don't look closely enough to tell the difference between expired and valid ones.

Trevor, who I'm staying with, keeps an apartment with a Dutchman, an Australian and (I think?) a German. The place is practically a CouchSurfing hub. (Trevor's CouchSurfing profile has a bit that reads, Where does "CouchSurfing" end and "normal life" begin? That line has disappeared for me, and his flat was featured in a recent issue of Zitty Berlin, in an article about couchsurfing and how awesome it is.) I don't think I could handle having so many strangers in my space constantly (though I guess a co-op is arguably a less intense version of this), but it's kinda fun to meet all these Europeans for now. And they've met a lot of people in Berlin through the site, as well.

Everyone seems to speak at least a little English. There are shop signs in English and brand names in English. I've heard from multiple people now that American English peppers nearly every European language; I had thought this was just the case with Japanese, but I guess the whole world is being culturally imperialized. Some Swedes I met jokingly blamed the Internet, then stuck by the statement more seriously.

"Schmuck" is the word for "jewellery" here, so I see it on signs everywhere.

I keep seeing billboards for Lucky Strikes that say "iSmoke" -- that's right: Apple-style. This seems like it has to be a joke, like this blog post that came up when I Google searched for iSmoke, but there's no indication that it's a joke ... just a picture of Lucky Strikes and the iSmoke slogan. I can't decide which would be crazier: if Lucky Strike simply started putting the advertisements out there and risking a giant lawsuit, or if Apple is actually deciding to lend its brand power to Lucky Strike cigarettes. It has to be option #1, but that seems like such a foolhardy move on Lucky Strike's part ....

There is such a thing as a "currywurst". I am pretty excited about this concept. I ate one today, but it wasn't that amazing. Supposedly, a nearby stand (Witty's, in Wittenbergplatz) sells the best currywurst in Berlin. I will go there soon ... it's supposed to be organic, too!

Abandoned Carnival Fun )

Genius Concept: Incredible Gaming Café! )

On the way from the café to the train station, we passed the longest surviving stretch of the Berlin wall. Did you know it's covered in graffiti murals?

Untranslatable Words in Swedish )

Lastly, the Best Thing I Have Discovered: The Swedish government funds gaming groups. No, really. )

Okay, to bed for me. I want to get up before 3PM tomorrow and do some walking in a more distant area.
Comments: 22 smoky flames - light a scarlet candle.

Wednesday, February 27th, 2008

Subject:if you knew how much I loved you, you would run away
Time:11:25 pm.
Mood: cheerful.
Music:VAST -- "Pretty When You Cry".
I haven't updated at all recently, have I. Well, firstly, it's Mark's birthday. Happy birthday Mark, now I can make fun of you for being in your mid-twenties!

Also:

1) I'm going to Berlin: March 2-12. So-called "purpose": visiting my dear old college friend Trevor. Are you in Berlin? I can see you! Do you want me to bring messages / queries / vows of eternal transcontinental love to Trevor? I can do that!

2) People who use Craigslist have very little reading comprehension, as demonstrated by the many answers I've received to this ad where people assume that I have a whole run of 1960s "Playboy" issues, or all the issues from February 1968-November 1968, or whatever. But hey, if you know anyone who might be interested in many copies of the same vintage "Playboy" issue, just send 'em my way. Also, does anyone have any ideas on how to sell them more efficiently than Craigslist? eBay is most likely the answer (I heard there's something called a "Dutch auction" that would suit my needs?), but I fear making an account. Oh well.

3) I've been paid for doing calligraphy. Man, when I wrote my senior thesis on calligraphy and roleplaying games, I never realized it'd be such a moneymaker.

Here is a picture of the golden letters I painted on the wall of a local restaurant, Chant:



I also did some wall-calligraphy for Hyde Park Produce, the neighbourhood's preeminent (and currently, only) grocery store. Unfortunately it's hard to read because of the lighting, but here are some pictures:



.



And here's a signature I designed for a contest. I didn't win, but I like it anyway.



My next project is doing the cover for a wedding planner's portfolio. Great things are ahead for Miss Lydia the calligrapher!

...

Garfield Minus Garfield
My God. It turns out that when you remove Garfield from Garfield, the comic is actually funny!
from Housemate Kevin.

Pentagon report investigated lasers that put voices in your head
A recently unclassified report from the Pentagon from 1998 has revealed an investigation into using laser beams for a few intriguing potential methods of non-lethal torture. Some of the applications the report investigated include putting voices in people's heads, using lasers to trigger uncontrolled neuron firing, and slowly heating the human body to a point of feverish confusion - all from hundreds of meters away.
A US citizen requested access to the document, entitled "Bioeffects of Selected Non-Lethal Weapons," under the Freedom of Information Act a little over a year ago. There is no evidence that any of the technologies mentioned in the 10-year-old report have been developed since the time it was written.

I can't wait.

And! Scientists Create a Black That Erases Virtually All Light
Researchers in New York reported this month that they have created a paper-thin material that absorbs 99.955 percent of the light that hits it, making it by far the darkest substance ever made -- about 30 times as dark as the government's current standard for blackest black.
I am going to wear this all the time.

Cool-looking steampunk insect sculptures
If anyone wants to get me something for ... um ... my birthday, you know ... in July ....
from [info]v1c1ous.

Hilarious Toronto takeoff ads parody psychotropic drugs
"When Amy started thinking for herself, we had to nip it in the bud with Obay(tm)."
from [info]agnoster.

Cool Chicago exhibition: Imaging by Numbers: A Historical View of the Computer Print
This groundbreaking new exhibition examines the intersection of digital technology and the graphic arts. Imaging by Numbers surveys the use of computers in printmaking and drawing through approximately 60 works created by nearly 40 North American and European artists from the 1950s to the present.

And! Seriously awesome Chicago exhibition: European Cartographers and the Ottoman World, 1500–1750
An important collection of early printed maps, atlases, and sea charts that trace the changing view of the Ottoman world from the Age of Discovery to the 18th century.
It's so awesome. I saw it. Go see it.

Improv Everywhere: Frozen Grand Central
On a cold Saturday in New York City, the world’s largest train station came to a sudden halt. Over 200 Improv Everywhere Agents froze in place at the exact same second for five minutes in the Main Concourse of Grand Central Station.
If you've never heard of Improv Everywhere, this is a fantastic introduction. If you have, this is one of their best ever.
from [info]dvitol.

Motivated by tax [and very clever public relations], Irish spurn plastic bags
In 2002, Ireland passed a tax on plastic bags; customers who want them must now pay 33 cents per bag at the register. There was an advertising awareness campaign. And then something happened that was bigger than the sum of these parts.
Within weeks, plastic bag use dropped 94 percent. Within a year, nearly everyone had bought reusable cloth bags, keeping them in offices and in the backs of cars. Plastic bags were not outlawed, but carrying them became socially unacceptable — on a par with wearing a fur coat or not cleaning up after one’s dog.

Don't you love it when governments are sensible?
Comments: 12 smoky flames - light a scarlet candle.

Saturday, February 2nd, 2008

Subject:some things are none of our business
Time:3:56 am.
I've read a lot of articles about "conducting yourself" at work in the past year -- some out of vague interest, some forwarded to me by various people. There's something I find really frustrating about the way we're instructed to deal with personal information and the corporate environment, which is: the problem is cast as the fault of "people who don't know how to keep things private", rather than "people who judge other people for private matters".

I touched on this a little bit in the angry entry I wrote about the Craigslist BDSM sex-baiting prank, and I've thought about it at intervals since, usually when reading articles like this one.

I'll try to sum up the bit that annoys me with a quotation:
Sally in Sales refuses to back down from a challenge. She refuses to take no for an answer. Did you hear she refuses to breast-feed? Amber in Accounting leaves no stone unturned. She leaves the office late when necessary. Did you hear she's leaving her husband?
... "There's generally no clear rule about where to draw the line, so a good rule of thumb is to avoid issues that might make someone uncomfortable," Morem says. Such topics of conversation may include romance, physical appearance, health, race, religion and personal finance.
"It's better to pretend your personal microphone is always on. Don't say something if you don't want it heard or repeated," he says. "Making an unsuitable remark damages how others perceive you, and the negative effects on reputation and future advancement can be long-term."


On the surface, this is reasonable advice, I suppose: don't talk about things you'd rather other people didn't know. The moral underneath it, however, can be summed up this way:

People at work have the right to judge you for your personal life. If you let someone know that, say, you don't breast-feed, then you may be losing a chance at a promotion, and you have no one to blame but yourself.

Why does my boss get to judge me if I choose not to breast-feed? Why is this seen as reasonable? Doesn't it seem like we, as a society, should be approaching this from a different angle? In our better moments, I think we acknowledge this: we do, after all, have laws that are supposed to protect people from being judged inappropriately for their private lives (e.g., laws that protect homosexuals from workplace discrimination).

Yet it's as if we're functionally being told that the entire workplace is one giant Don't Ask, Don't Tell environment in every single way -- except that unlike the original "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy, nobody seems to question this.

And what's really crazy is that we're entering an age of totally free information. You can already find out more from the Internet about a given person in five minutes than most people could discover by asking around for several hours, 15 years ago. But naturally, such employment-advice articles don't take this as an indication that maybe people should be encouraged to tone down harsh judgments -- or even encouraged to keep personal information from biasing them against a coworker / employee.

Instead, our generation is being lambasted by our elders for everything from daring to blog, to daring to write affectionate emails to our lovers, to daring to post photos on Facebook. Now, I can see why we'd be advised not to say stupid or insulting things about our bosses in public; but these advisers go way beyond that. If a potential employer finds a photo of you on Facebook holding a beer -- these articles say -- then it's your own fault if they decide not to hire you on that basis. You should never have allowed that photo to see daylight! Never mind if you didn't post the photo. Never mind if the employer was snooping around specifically looking for personal information. And never mind if every single person your age in America has held a beer at some point. This isn't about reasonable societal expectations. It's about the fact that you held a beer once, you degenerate -- and therefore you don't deserve to be respected during the 98% of the time that you are not holding a beer.

And good God, it can get so much worse! -- what if you write a love email to your boyfriend, and he forwards it to someone else, and somehow your boss sees it? In such a case, you're to blame: you should never have written that love email, you should never have trusted your boyfriend, you should never have assumed that your boss wouldn't care what your sex life is like. The issue is not that your boyfriend is an asshole to forward the email, and the issue is not that your sex life has nothing to do with your boss. I have actually read several articles that specifically deal with this exact question, and they all say the same thing: that you shouldn't be writing such things in the first place.

Do I detect some Puritan flavoring in these judgments? Not that, you know, American society is maybe a bit Puritan. Or anything like that.

But this kind of Puritanism can't survive in an information-free society. Can it? God, I hope not. I pray that it can't. Because if it can, we're going to be seeing one ugly, judgmental, blacklisting free-for-all, and we're going to be seeing it really soon.

I'm hoping that actually, what's happening here is a kind of culture clash, as the younger, more information-free generation starts assimilating into the workplace. Articles instructing us to be discreet, in that case, might be viewed as something along the lines of old curmudgeons trying to keep corporate America "like it's always been": an attempt to tell us that we can't get away with our free-information ways in their world. With luck, if this is true, the opposition will find that we're plentiful and inevitable ... and eventually, they'll back down and accept that it's actually really stupid not to hire someone because you saw a Facebook photo of him holding a beer. With luck.

...

'I've Got Nothing to Hide' and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy
In this short essay, written for a symposium in the San Diego Law Review, Professor Daniel Solove examines the nothing to hide argument. When asked about government surveillance and data mining, many people respond by declaring: I've got nothing to hide. According to the nothing to hide argument, there is no threat to privacy unless the government uncovers unlawful activity, in which case a person has no legitimate justification to claim that it remain private. The nothing to hide argument and its variants are quite prevalent, and thus are worth addressing. In this essay, Solove critiques the nothing to hide argument and exposes its faulty underpinnings.
I originally posted this link last entry, but decided to move it to this entry due to tangential relatedness.
from [info]dwarmstr_blog.
Comments: 26 smoky flames - light a scarlet candle.

Friday, February 1st, 2008

Subject:shadows leave us standing naked, we can't fake it
Time:6:29 am.
2.5 years ago, when I was working at Bookstore X, I was having a really, really rough summer in some ways (and a fantastic one in other ways). I read High Fidelity at that time, and I took down a long quotation which felt both hilarious and relevant. It's been in my Stickies file ever since; at the time, even just a quotation like this seemed a bit personal to post. But it's so much less relevant to me now that, well, here you go.

(And don't take this to mean too much about what was going on with me, back then. It's not relevant in the ways you might think. Or perhaps it is. :grin:)

I wake up around dawn, and I have the same feeling I had the other night, the night I caught on about Laura and Ray: that I've got no ballast, nothing to weigh me down, and if I don't hang on, I'll just float away. I like Marie a lot, she's funny and smart and pretty and talented, but who the hell is she? I don't mean that philosophically. I just mean, I don't know her from Eve, so what am I doing in her bed? Surely there's a better, safer, more friendly place for me than this? But I know there isn't, not at the moment, and that scares me rigid.

I get up, find my snazzy boxers and my T-shirt, go into the living room, fumble in my jacket pocket for my fags and sit in the dark smoking. After a little while Marie